Buy on Amazon
£399.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1149
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.06/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX or Core i9-10900F
Dirt 5, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
71 FPS
£16.17/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i9-10900F
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,147.95
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
