Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 83 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 138 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2376 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1558
92.95942720763723%
Multi-Core
13904
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |