Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2747 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than FX-4350 - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £137.33 vs £292.49
- Up to 45% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 5950X - £1.24 vs £2.25 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £292.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |