Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 989 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - 208 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £177.67 vs £325.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £177.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73801 minutes ago
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
61.27970749542961%
Multi-Core
8426
68.73317562607065%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |