Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 115 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Remnant II than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 92 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 20 vs 12 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
92
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£414.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £414.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |