Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 924 days older than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 123 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 20 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Single-Core
1282
90.15471167369901%
Multi-Core
5129
58.41020384921991%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |