Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 598 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 2500X - 210 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 20 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£426.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £426.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
62.563811684628476%
Multi-Core
3801
41.52283154904959%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |