Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core i9-13900

Ryzen 5 2500X vs Core i9-13900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel Core 13th Generation i9-13900 Desktop Processor (24 Core (8 P-Core + 16 E-Core), 36 MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz, LGA1700, Intel UHD Graphics 770)

Buy for £419.33 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 32591 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel Core 13th Generation i9-13900 Desktop Processor (24 Core (8 P-Core + 16 E-Core), 36 MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz, LGA1700, Intel UHD Graphics 770)

Buy for £419.33 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 32591 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1577 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 131 vs 101 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo
Ryzen 5 2500X

Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018


FPS

101

77.09923664122137%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

131

100%

Value, £/FPS

£3.2/FPS

100%

Price, £

£419.33

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core 13th Generation i9-13900 Desktop Processor (24 Core (8 P-Core + 16 E-Core), 36 MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz, LGA1700, Intel UHD Graphics 770)

Buy for £419.33 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 32591 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo
Ryzen 5 2500X

Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo
Ryzen 5 2500X

Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018


Single-Core

1103

40.64112011790715%

Multi-Core

3801

23.14014367466212%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

100%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

vs
Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

Sep 10th, 2018Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Ryzen 5CollectionCore i9
Pinnacle RidgeCodenameRaptor Lake
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
24
8Threads
32
3.6 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.0 GHz
4.0 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz
65 WTDP65 W
12 nmProcess Size
10 nm
36.0x
Multiplier20.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using Ryzen 5 2500X or Core i9-13900

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

© 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.