Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £175.0 vs £325.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 194 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75667 minutes ago
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
63.06682577565632%
Multi-Core
3294
39.093282696415855%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |