Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £175.0 vs £246.78
- Up to 26% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900F - £1.03 vs £1.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Ryzen 5 2400G - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
170
95%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16099 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.39/FPS
74%
Price, £
£246.78
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for £246.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |