Buy on Amazon
£170
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6350 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - £49.99 vs £170.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 1400 - £0.3 vs £0.99 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Desktop CPU - AM4/Quad Core/3.2GHz – 3.4GHz Turbo/8MB/65W
Buy for £170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 1400
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
