Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2747 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - £59.97 vs £239.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Ryzen 9 5900X - £0.43 vs £1.61 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Metro Exodus than FX-4350 - 149 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for £239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |