Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - £59.97 vs £231.37
- Up to 70% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-12700F - £0.36 vs £1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-4350 - 189 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
29%
Price, £
£231.37
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £231.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |