Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £59.97 vs £169.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-11600K - £0.4 vs £0.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 85% better in F1 23 than FX-4350 - 276 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
64%
Price, £
£169.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |