Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4790 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4790.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4790 - 204 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-4790 - £125.43 vs £169.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4790 - £0.61 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£125.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £125.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78246 minutes ago
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |