Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Core i5-4670K - 802 vs 690 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £71.18 vs £189.99
- Up to 58% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11600K - £0.1 vs £0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
802
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
41%
Price, £
£189.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for £189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
690
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |