Buy on Amazon
£71.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670K is 34 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than FX-4350 - 188 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Rust than FX-4350 - £0.38 vs £0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - £59.97 vs £71.18
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I5-4670K I5 4670K I5 4670 K 3.4 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 84W 6M CPU Processor LGA 1150
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
