Buy on Amazon
£169.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6350 - 184 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £52.95 vs £169.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11600K - £0.32 vs £0.92 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
34%
Price, £
£169.99
31%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3.9 GHz / 4.9 GHz, 12M Cache)
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8680 minutes ago
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8679 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
