Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £59.97 vs £186.96
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 161% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-4350 - 60 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for £186.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
