Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 219 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 3500X - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £89.95 vs £158.88
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600K - £0.67 vs £1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
57%
Price, £
£158.88
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
134
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |