Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3100 - 62 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £73.89 vs £158.88
- Up to 51% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-10600K - £1.25 vs £2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.56/FPS
48%
Price, £
£158.88
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
59
95%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£73.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £73.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |