Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £59.97 vs £219.45
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - £0.54 vs £1.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-4350 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
30%
Price, £
£219.45
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for £219.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |