Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2401 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - £59.97 vs £499.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 9 3950X - £0.28 vs £2.17 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than FX-4350 - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.17/FPS
12%
Price, £
£499.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |