Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3906 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £59.97 vs £514.33
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900F - £0.24 vs £1.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than FX-4350 - 289 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.78/FPS
13%
Price, £
£514.33
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |