Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £59.97 vs £465.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-13900KF - £0.34 vs £1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 56% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-4350 - 279 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.67/FPS
20%
Price, £
£465.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |