Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £59.97 vs £449.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10900K - £0.09 vs £0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than FX-4350 - 734 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |