Buy on Amazon
£449
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 220 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £49.95 vs £449.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900K - £0.23 vs £2.04 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i9-10900K (base stroke: 3.70GHz; socket: LGA1200; 125W) box, BX8070110900K
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 408 minutes ago
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
214
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
