Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2558 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4350 - 183 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
