Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900K - 146 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £111.26 vs £449.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900K - £0.76 vs £3.28 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£111.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £111.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |