Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £111.37 vs £523.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-14900K - £0.78 vs £3.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-13100F - 151 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£111.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £111.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 317 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.47/FPS
22%
Price, £
£523.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for £523.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |