Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £59.97 vs £416.21
- Up to 83% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i9-12900F - £0.32 vs £1.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 18% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-4350 - 221 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
221
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.88/FPS
17%
Price, £
£416.21
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £416.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |