Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F and the cheaper Celeron G6900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - 212 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £66.99 vs £388.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900F - £0.35 vs £1.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £66.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |