Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £65.92 vs £449.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900K - £0.19 vs £1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 362 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
355
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£65.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £65.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |