Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 946 days newer than Core i3-7100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
165
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |