Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 587 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than EPYC 7282 - 781 vs 759 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
781
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |