Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 335 days newer than Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 200GE - 202 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
Rome | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |