Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 587 days older than Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than Pentium Gold G6405 - 239 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 58 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£47.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £47.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |