Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1924 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1840 - 176 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 53 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
168
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1840 Processor 2.8 GHz LGA1150 2 MB Cache Boxed CPU
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
