Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $285.98 vs $604.65
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $2.12 vs $4.04 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 166 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
150
90%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€317.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €317.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.04/FPS
52%
Price, €
€671.16
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |