Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2675 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $285.98 vs $338.95
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-14900KF - $1.21 vs $1.36 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 276 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 32 vs 16 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
263
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€317.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €317.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
89%
Price, €
€376.23
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |