Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 206 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $228.83 vs $317.44
- Up to 30% better value when playing Control than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.11 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €317.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7155 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€228.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €228.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7154 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |