Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2399 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 80 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $160.61 vs $285.98
- Up to 61% better value when playing Starfield than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $2.23 vs $5.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €317.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €178.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |