Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 242 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $251.35 vs $317.44
- Up to 27% better value when playing Fortnite than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.04 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €317.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7194 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7193 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |