Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 2114 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 178 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $64.12 vs $188.40
- Up to 68% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.40 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €71.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |