Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 148 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $140.39 vs $188.40
- Up to 37% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.05 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €155.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |