Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1758 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 370 vs 338 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $139.59 vs $188.40
- Up to 32% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.42 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
370
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €154.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |