![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Buy on Amazon
€209.12
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $294
Availability
MSRP $294
AvailabilityMSRP $549
Availability
MSRP $549
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1599 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $188.40 vs $236.74
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 81% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 76 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $3.46 vs $4.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€262.78
79%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €262.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
