Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700K is 1963 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 22% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 298 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $168.01 vs $188.40
- Up to 26% better value when playing Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.63 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |