Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 5396 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $17.97 vs $671.13
- Up to 96% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.17 vs $4.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 58% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9650 - 163 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
103
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6890 minutes ago
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6890 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Agena | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |