Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 5052 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $17.97 vs $69.19
- Up to 50% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-12100F - $0.15 vs $0.30 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 93% better in War Thunder than Phenom X4 9650 - 233 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
121
52%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6894 minutes ago
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6894 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |