Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 4970 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $17.97 vs $251.35
- Up to 83% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-12900K - $0.14 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 136% better in F1 23 than Phenom X4 9650 - 307 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
130
42%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €17.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6906 minutes ago
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6906 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |